Fox News Cuts Democrats Response to Bush Veto of Troop Money

	Duration: 142 seconds Upload Time: 07-05-02 05:29:41 User: LiberalViewer :::: Favorites
Description: FOX NEWS BIAS playlist at: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D When Pres. George W Bush came out to explain the second veto of his presidency on May 1, I expected all the cable news networks to cover the live news event. I was somewhat surprised, however, to see Fox News drop out of covering the live Democratic response that came just 10 minutes later. I was most surprised to hear Fox News Washington Managing Editor Brit Hume explain candidly on live TV who he was helping with his editorial decision. Share with friends
Comments
realestMC ::: Favorites actually yes popular science has long been known to be a CIA front, think of it as a magazine that lets them tell you what to think it possible, that's a very useful tool when one is covertly running a state. as far as the liberal bias on the internet... sorry buddy that's the liberal bias of reality, love it or leave it (please feel free to leave) 07-07-22 01:09:53 _____________________________________________________
realestMC ::: Favorites so are you suggesting that FOX news never uses insulting nicknames for people? I guess you've never watched. by the way the numerology of FOX is 666, if anyone has ever wondered why they use that, and CBS has the all seeing eye 07-07-22 01:12:38 _____________________________________________________
realestMC ::: Favorites even PBS has been taken over by republicans 07-07-22 01:13:33 _____________________________________________________
abates17 ::: Favorites There are some adverbs which do not modify verbs; "multiply" is one of them. Given that you have not shown a definition where it is shown modifying a verb, and given that "multiply refuted" is used all the time where "refuted" is an adjective, but never when it is a verb, the evidence seems to be in my favor. But of course, that doesn't matter to you, since you can never admit that you are wrong, about anything. 07-07-23 12:20:29 _____________________________________________________
abates17 ::: Favorites Care to provide any examples of Fox News using insulting nicknames? And as for using numerology to prove that Fox is somehow evil...wow. Just...wow. 07-07-23 12:22:10 _____________________________________________________
LiberalViewer ::: Favorites abates17, Again, I have a dictionary installed on my MacBook that says the adverb "multiply" is only used "<b>often</b> as submodifier." Do you have a source saying it can be used <b>only</b> as a submodifier? I also already showed your Google search is flawed using the word "nimbly" and u ignored the refutation and keep using the refuted argument. MORE: 07-07-25 22:36:57 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
LiberalViewer ::: Favorites MORE: I further showed u how the meaning of "multiply" itself tells u it can modify a verb which u also ignored. I also gave you examples where I had admitted I was wrong yet u continue to <b>falsely</b> claim <i>"you can never admit that you are wrong, about anything."</i> Ready to admit you were wrong <i>again</i>? Thx 4 subscription/comments :-) 07-07-25 22:38:00 _____________________________________________________
abates17 ::: Favorites I never claimed it can only be used as a submodifier. In fact, I'm not sure why you even brought that up, since you are not using it as a submodifier. Just because it is sometimes not a submodifier, that doesn't imply that it can modify a verb. And your Google search is flawed because there are no results for "nimbly refuted," so that doesn't show anything about how it is used. But for "multiply refuted," every search result but yours uses it to modify an adjective. 07-07-26 05:58:27 _____________________________________________________
ronstew1955 ::: Favorites whaa! Whaa! Whaa! I want my mommie!!! I didn't get the same amount of time as george did! Whaa! Whaa! Whaa!Fox News cheated me! I AM SICK OF BUSH BASHERS!!! I don't like the shape the world is in any more than anyone else. But I truely haven't heard anyone come up with a better plan. Dubbya is doing the best he can given the world he has to work with. And that world includes Al-Quida and a sorry Demorcraticly controled congress. 07-07-27 00:42:12 _____________________________________________________
Grill369 ::: Favorites Democrats had a full book of ideas for the war that the gave bush and he barely did more than glance at it. Why put mor troops in Iraq when were done with it, Saddam is out, however he was no threat to America. He didnt plan bombings on 9/11 Al Quida did, and we didnt go after them, there just getting stronger we never went to afghanistan, where Al Quida and Osama are. 07-07-28 13:35:10 _____________________________________________________